I thought that I would put a few discussion topics as they pertain to this week’s reading.
1. How does the role of hypothesis relate to this paper?
2. Is citation bias a general problem? If so, what drives these biases? What are solutions that individuals and populations can address?
3. Last year we read “Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes” by Schleuning et al. inCurrent Biology – 23 October 2012 (Vol. 22, Issue 20, pp. 1925-1931). Is this the beginning of a paradigm shift?
4. What are the hypothesized mechanisms for the alternative hypothesis that specialization positively correlated with latitude?
I like the idea of putting up discussion comments before PAInt every week. Hopefully it will keep us focused and lead to better conversations. I have a discussion topic to add:
5: How much contrary evidence needs to be presented before a status quo should be broken? Or in other words, how much evidence do Moles and others have to present before I should believe them and cite their papers instead of the traditional literature?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
UNR Plant-Animal Interactions Graduate Reading Group
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.